Some complain that editors are requiring things that are not important to the paper. Who disregards peers advice, etc. How original is the topic? Heres how not to do it: recently I had a paper get a reject-and-resubmit decision; I made the best effort I could to revise it, including redoing all the statistical analysis and redrawing the figures, and sent it back, together with a detailed set of responses to all of the earlier criticisms; and quite some time later it came back with a second reject-and-resubmit decision. Some of the options you might want to consider include: 1. (n.d.). Start by addressing the easy changes (such as rewording, adding references, and changing technical errors) (Wong, 2019). They have been there and they are still publishing papers. Inaccurate conclusions on assumptions that are not supported by your data. Similar to the polite rejection, this email will advise you on why the agent said no. On average, authors took about 11 weeks to resubmit, nearly as long as HSR took to get reviews. Sorry to hear that your manuscript was rejected, that too, after being with the journal for quite some time. What is the difference between revise and resubmit and major revision? How to Bounce Back From Manuscript Rejection. Social rejection increases anger, anxiety, depression, jealousy and sadness. Another problem being reported by journal editors is that authors are ignoring reviewer comments. Scholarship being what scholarship is, and academic reviewers being who academic reviewers are, it is rare for a paper to be accepted with no revisions requested. Theres no need to say anything beyond something like this: Thank you for reading my work and providing this detailed feedback. In addition while submitting to a second journal, I have disclosed that the manuscript was rejected by the previous submission in my communication. It should highlight in brief the reasons why they could not take on your manuscript at this time. Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. If it has no data, no peer review is required because it has no science. A polite rejection is a slightly longer email than a form rejection. You are using an out of date browser. Something that authors often worry about is manuscript rejection. But I The reasons for a paper being rejected once it has been reviewed fall mainly into two categories: (1) problems with the research; and (2) problems with the It means the journal editor likes something about your paper. I introduced this when I took over as editor of a sociology journal for exactly the reason identified by other contributors, namely that Revise and Resubmit created too much moral pressure to publish the resulting text. Since this experience is common among researchers, if you think you need it, give yourself some time to recover from rejection. We seemed to be leading authors on in instances where they eventually got re-rejected anyway, or at best, had a just passable paper after a lot of time and work from the reviewers, editor, and editorial office. WebThe rejection reason was pathetic - saying it's a misfit for the journal. Maybe the reviewer was not an appropriate person to review the paper. Im interested in what you mean by the science involved with peer review of articles in the humanities. Are figures & tables, language and manuscript structure all clear enough to accurately assess the work? If I get a personal rejection where the editor praises the story but declines it for wrong fit or some other reason that has nothing to do with the writing, there is a 100% chance Ill send that story out again. I also get R&R before each acceptance. Therefore, make the recommended changes before submitting. On the subject of peer review within social science and humanities. That same reviewer gets the exact same paper from Journal B. ( Edit : I just realized that DSVA already mentioned this as a comment to an answer; in any case I think it deserved to be made an answer) Your que For journals that are looking to publish top tier content, passable is not good enough. Since the editor didn't do this, it's still possible your paper will be declined. Are there any factual errors or invalid arguments? After you decide to talk to your co-authors, you realize that you will be the one doing additional laboratory work and writing to address the reviewers comments. It may or may not go into greater depth than the polite rejection. I say this because I recently blogged about a junk paper, which the journal editor said was peer reviewed. Most journals normally take 4-8 weeks to review manuscripts. You ha A Guide for Writing and Editing a Research Manuscript. Then, get to work revising your manuscript! It is interesting to read of the journals who have moved away from Decline and Resubmit. Sticking to the facts and avoiding personal attacks is imperative. When this happens, consider objectively if there are any fatal flaws. Reviewers will evaluate the originality and thoroughness of your work, and whether it is within scope for the journal you have submitted to. A simple sentence or two explaining why the change was not made will typically suffice. These are the papers that despite getting detailed reviews, fail to improve to an acceptable level. Below are different types of rejection letters from the journal editor (Roediger III et al., 2019, pg. Have they cited all the relevant work that would contradict their thinking and addressed it appropriately? I put the resubmission chance at 75% because if I start getting a bunch of form rejections with no other feedback, Ill probably take that as a sign the story isnt working and revise it. (LogOut/ Did my dues and checked out their published works before I choose this journal. Do you agree with the feedback provided? . As an aside, is it normal for people regularly submitting to journals to get the revise & resubmit response? Which Is More Stable Thiophene Or Pyridine? ? Usually, it would require extensive revision, in most cases, adding new experiments or redoing the data analysis. First, papers going through review are a lot more likely to be accepted. As an intern, I was able to read through the agencys slush pile, discuss that days haul with my advisor, and then act on obvious noes. Yes, this meant that as a twenty-one-year-old, at least for those unsolicited manuscripts, I wielded the power of the form rejection. Ask them to help you navigate the comments. 1. The required cumulative minimum is 10-15 pages of formal writing apart from any informal writing activities and assignments. Icons made by various authors from www.flaticon.com, Experiential Live Edit: How to improve Biomed manuscripts. Once reviews indicate a paper is on the right track but revisions are needed, the journal has an interest in its success: publication is not a sure thing, but the odds are favorable. The papers were criticized for having too short a review period. Youll do nothing more than become fodder for the water cooler. [CDATA[// >